<!-- 14. Risks and Failure Points — from "After the EU's Golden Passports", Kestrel Private, 6 August 2026. Canonical: https://kestrelprivate.com/research/after-the-golden-passports -->

# 14. Risks and Failure Points

This chapter states, in one place, what can go wrong. It is the report's risk register in prose; Appendix K reproduces it in tabular form for an engagement file.

Each section states the risk, who bears it, the drivers on the verified record, what may be done about it, and what cannot be mitigated. The last of those matters most: a register that ends every entry with a mitigation is a marketing document, and several risks below have none available to a private client. The risks are not ranked by probability, because no probability can be evidenced for a legislative change, an administrative refusal or a bank's onboarding decision. Statements of current status are made as at 2 August 2026.

## 14.1 Programme suspension or legislative change

Both components rest on instruments the enacting states may amend or repeal. This risk runs through every other section of the chapter.

**The Greek record.** Two threshold changes in under eighteen months, and three regimes since 2013.

| Period | Minimum qualifying investment | Instrument | Transitional arrangement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 – April 2023 | €250,000 nationwide | Art. 20B L.4251/2014 and predecessors | — |
| From 2023 | €500,000 in designated high-demand areas; €250,000 elsewhere | Art. 91 L.5007/2022 (A′ 241/23.12.2022) | Art. 92: 10% deposit by 30 April 2023, extended to 31 July 2023; completion by 31 December 2023 |
| From 5 April 2024 | €800,000 (Attica Region, Regional Unit of Thessaloniki, Mykonos, Thira, islands over 3,100 inhabitants); €400,000 elsewhere; €250,000 for the change-of-use and listed-building exceptions | Art. 64 L.5100/2024 (A′ 49/05.04.2024) | 10% deposit or pre-agreement by 31 August 2024; completion by 28 February 2025 (extended from 31 December 2024 by Art. 37 §1 L.5167/2024); substitute property by 30 April 2025 |

*Table 14.1 — Greek investor-permit threshold changes. Thresholds and transitional dates as enacted; the 2023 designated-area list was not read in the gazette and is not reproduced. Sources: L.5007/2022 Arts. 91–92; L.5100/2024 Art. 64 as codified with L.5167/2024.*[^14-1][^14-2]

Each change carried a transitional window measured in months: a client already committed was given time to complete, a client merely contemplating a purchase was not. Permits granted under prior conditions remain in force and are renewed provided the conditions in force at the time of grant continue to be met.[^14-2] That grandfathering is the principal mitigation and it is conditional: it protects the permit, not the value of the property supporting it, and does nothing for an application not yet filed.

**Commission posture after Malta.** The Court of Justice of the European Union's judgment of 29 April 2025 in Case C-181/23 concerned a naturalisation scheme and said nothing about residence permits.[^14-3] The Commission's recommendation of 28 March 2022 asks member states to repeal investor citizenship schemes immediately, but asks only that investor residence schemes be operated with strong checks.[^14-4] As at 2 August 2026 no adopted EU instrument prohibits investor residence schemes and no new Commission initiative had been located after the judgment.[^14-5] The realistic channel of change is national: Spain ended its programme on 3 April 2025 and Portugal removed real estate from its own in 2023.[^14-6] Greek policy may move the same way. See §7.14.

**The São Tomé side.** Three drivers are on the record. The programme is approximately one year old — Decree-Law No. 07/2025 entered into force on publication on 1 August 2025, and did not pass through Parliament, which the opposition criticised publicly.[^14-7] President Vila Nova was re-elected in the first round on 19 July 2026 with 55.94% on preliminary results, and parliamentary elections are scheduled for 27 September 2026, with the principal opposition party on record wanting the nationality law revised; continuity must be assessed on that post-election picture.[^14-8] And Regulation (EU) 2025/2441 (OJ 10 December 2025) inserted Article 8a(1)(e) into Regulation (EU) 2018/1806, permitting suspension of a visa exemption where a listed third country grants citizenship in exchange for pre-determined payments or investments without a genuine link.[^14-9]

That ground cannot apply to São Tomé and Príncipe, which is already in Annex I and holds no exemption to suspend.[^14-10] Vanuatu is the executed precedent for a state that did: partial suspension of its visa waiver from 4 May 2022, full suspension from 4 February 2023, and permanent transfer to Annex I by Regulation (EU) 2025/11, on investor-citizenship grounds throughout.[^14-11] The Commission's Eighth Report under the mechanism applies the same logic to five Eastern Caribbean states, describing such schemes as a "potential ground" for suspension and asking those states to vet applicants "pending the discontinuation of those schemes".[^14-12] The reading for this structure is narrow: the Vanuatu failure mode is loss of visa-free access, and São Tomé has none to lose. The analogous exposure is programme discontinuation or deteriorating institutional acceptance, not a change in Schengen mobility, which arises here from the Greek residence permit and never from the São Tomé passport.

**Who bears it.** The client, entirely. **What cannot be mitigated:** legislative sovereignty. A state that may create a programme by decree may amend or end it the same way.

## 14.2 Fee and threshold increases

A more frequent version of the same risk: the programme continues, on different terms.

On the citizenship side the power is express. The responsible ministers may, by joint order, alter the fees and minimum contribution amounts in Anexo I, subject to two qualifications: the power operates "without prejudice to commitments assumed by the State in specific instruments", and an update does not affect processes already admitted.[^14-13] Admission, not engagement or payment of a fee, is the point at which published figures crystallise for a file.

On the residence side the €250,000 threshold, the €2,000 permit fee, the €150 and €450 family-member fees and the €16 card charge are set by statute and alterable by statute.[^14-14] Türkiye is the cleanest external illustration of decree-level instability: its real-estate threshold moved from a lira amount to US$250,000 and then to US$400,000, the last change by Karar 5554, published in the Official Gazette of 13 May 2022 and in force from 13 June 2022.[^14-15]

| Component | Point at which published figures crystallise | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| São Tomé contribution and fees | Formal admission of the application | RNID Art. 22(2) |
| Greek investment threshold | Enactment of the amending statute, subject to its transitional window | L.5100/2024 Art. 64 §4; L.5167/2024 Art. 37 §1 |
| Greek permit and card fees | No express rule located; the €2,000 electronic fee is a filing document under JMD 214926/2025 §2.6 — requires confirmation at the date of application | L.5038/2023 Art. 171 fixes the amount, not the moment at which it crystallises |
| Existing Greek permit on renewal | Conditions in force at the time of grant, provided they continue to be met | L.5100/2024 Art. 64 §3 |

*Table 14.2 — Crystallisation points by component. No arithmetic; the table records the legal moment at which a published figure becomes fixed for a given file, and the third row records that for Greek fees no such rule has been located in any instrument read. Sources: Decree-Law 07/2025 Art. 22; L.5038/2023 Art. 171; JMD 214926/2025 §2.6; L.5100/2024 Art. 64 as codified with L.5167/2024.*[^14-13][^14-14][^14-16][^14-2]

**Who bears it.** The client. **Mitigation:** every published schedule is current at its stated date only, and the cost model is recomputed against the schedules in force at the date of application (§10.1); the interval between engagement and admission is the exposed period. **What cannot be mitigated:** no private arrangement fixes a sovereign fee schedule.

## 14.3 Property ineligibility

The property may be a sound purchase and still fail to qualify. Chapter 8 sets out the qualifying conditions and technical evidence; this section states the risk only.

The category is narrow. The applicant must acquire full ownership and possession of one property with a minimum acquisition value of €250,000; the change of use of its main spaces must have been completed before the application is submitted; and the official administrative record requires completion after 5 April 2024.[^14-14][^14-17] Circular 1/2026 tightened it further: properties already residential on 5 April 2024 cannot be cycled out of and back into residential use, and a building-permit paper amendment alone does not count.[^14-18] Where the converted building is industrial, an engineer must certify that no industrial activity has been installed and in operation for at least the preceding five years.[^14-14] The threshold is reported in professional commentary to operate as once-only per property; what is statutory is the notary's duty to certify in the deed whether the property has previously supported an investor permit.[^14-14][^14-18]

An unresolved tension sits on the face of the material: the ministerial decision fixes the completion date by the issue date of the qualifying planning act, so a conversion licensed before 5 April 2024 could in principle qualify through a later permit-file update, while the circular polices substance and forbids paper conversions.[^14-16][^14-18] Both must be satisfied, and a file satisfying only the documentary test is exposed.

**Who bears it.** The buyer, who has already paid in full, the statute requiring the whole price to be paid before the application. **Mitigation:** the engineer's report and the notarial certificate exist before commitment where the seller accepts a conditional acquisition. **What cannot be mitigated:** administrative interpretation may change after purchase. Circular 1/2026 is itself the example, issued two years after the category opened and altering what qualified.

## 14.4 Conversion and planning defects

Distinct from ineligibility: the property qualifies and is nevertheless defective. See §8.5.

Two engineer's documents are in issue and they do different work. Under Article 83 of L.4495/2017 every inter vivos deed transferring a right in rem requires the owner's responsible declaration and an engineer's certificate that no unauthorised constructions or uses exist, or that they are excepted or regularised.[^14-19] The technical report required for the change-of-use category is a different document with a different function.[^14-16] A property may pass the second and fail the first. The Electronic Building Identity is reported mandatory for transfers, without which no transfer deed can be signed.[^14-20] Title investigation is complicated by the cadastre transition: legacy registries are person-based, the cadastre parcel-based, and which certificates exist depends on the property's transition status.[^14-21] Central Athens conversion stock is drawn from a building population averaging over 40 years old.[^14-22]

**Who bears it.** The buyer. **Mitigation:** legal and technical due diligence instructed by the buyer, not inherited from the seller (§8.4, §17.7). **What cannot be mitigated:** latent defects no reasonable inspection discloses, and the solvency of the party who carried out the conversion — a warranty is worth what its giver is worth (§8.13).

## 14.5 Citizenship refusal

Refusal grounds are partly statutory, partly discretionary. Nationality is refused to a foreigner whose criminal record shows a conviction carrying a prison sentence of more than one year, and the general naturalisation conditions — majority, no final conviction of three years or more, no terrorism or security concern, an activity ensuring subsistence — continue to apply notwithstanding the waiver of residence and language requirements.[^14-23] Nationality may not be granted to a person already holding more than two foreign nationalities, and from 10 April 2026 the responsible unit is reported to have suspended acceptance of applications from holders of three or more, invoking that cap.[^14-23][^14-24] The Government may also exclude applicants of designated nationalities by gazetted resolution; none had been located as at 2 August 2026, which is a dated statement of absence rather than an assurance.[^14-25]

The completed file goes to the Public Prosecutor for a prior *visto*; if the *visto* is refused the process lapses.[^14-25][^14-23] A further tension is unresolved: the Nationality Law has naturalisation granted by Government decree on the justice minister's favourable opinion, while the decree has the unit's director approving by *despacho*. Neither text explains the articulation, and no reading should be asserted without applicant-specific legal advice.[^14-25][^14-23]

The financial exposure on refusal is asymmetric in the client's favour and is one of the few structural protections in the position: the US$5,000 due-diligence and processing fee is non-refundable after submission, but the contribution is payable only after approval, and the process lapses if the deposit is not made within 90 days.[^14-25] A refused applicant loses the fee and the professional costs, not the contribution.

**Who bears it.** The client. **What cannot be mitigated:** approval is a government decision and cannot be guaranteed (§18.9); refusal need not be reasoned in terms the applicant can address, and the decree contains no express refund clause for any other scenario.

## 14.6 Residence refusal

The specific documentation for the category is exhaustively listed by ministerial decision, which makes most refusals documentary in origin; that is not the same as a rule that the decision is non-discretionary, and no located source states that it is. The list includes the notarial certificate covering payment, registration and ownership evidence, the engineer's technical report, a private insurance policy, the €2,000 electronic fee and the E9 declaration.[^14-16] A deficiency in any of them is a refusal risk, and the fee is paid on filing.[^14-14] An administrative appeal lies within two months, with a €50 fee, to be decided within 30 days.[^14-17]

The insurance condition is one document in that list and a procurement problem in practice. Cover must meet minimums fixed under the predecessor Code and still applied in practice, subject to confirmation at the date of application; premiums are reported at roughly €70 to €300 per adult per year for minimum-compliance cover, loaded at 65 and over and possibly unavailable at 75 and over. For a family application including a direct ascendant under Article 95 §2, that is a failure point and not a line item.[^14-28]

Two procedural traps deserve mention. Where the application is filed by proxy before the applicant enters Greece, an exclusive period of 12 months from filing runs within which the applicant and each family member must enter Greece to give biometrics and produce the outstanding insurance document; two failures to appear at the summoned date cause rejection.[^14-26] And the record's stated completion deadline of 50 days is not an end-to-end processing time: on the proxy route the file completes only when biometrics are given, and the Ministry's March 2026 statistics record 10,032 pending investor applications, of which 3,399 were filed in 2024.[^14-17][^14-27]

**Who bears it.** The client. **Mitigation:** complete documentary preparation before filing; realistic scheduling of the compulsory visit; an appeal where the ground is documentary. **What cannot be mitigated:** the property must already have been bought and paid for in full before the application is submitted, so the €250,000 is committed before any residence decision exists (see §14.17).

## 14.7 Source-of-funds failure

Source-of-funds preparation is treated in Chapter 15; this section records only its failure mode. The FATF and OECD recommend multi-layered due diligence in which each layer independently screens the applicant rather than relying on screening already undertaken by another, and assessment of source of wealth in addition to source of the specific investment funds, extending to the finances of accompanying family members.[^14-29] The citizenship application requires a declaration of the lawful origin of funds with supporting bank documentation and a due-diligence report from a recognised entity.[^14-25] On the Greek side the whole price must be paid by crossed bank cheque to the seller's account at a credit institution operating in Greece, by credit transfer, or by point-of-sale terminal of a provider operating in Greece, with every payment detail recorded in the notarial deed.[^14-14] There is a fiscal reason to route the money the same way: a non-resident taking Greek rental income becomes subject to the asset-acquisition presumption in the year of purchase, covered by documented imported foreign funds whose origin a non-resident need not justify, provided the banking evidence of the import exists and the money comes from the client's own foreign accounts in the buyer's name.[^14-30]

**Who bears it.** The client, and any professional who has committed resources in advance. **What cannot be mitigated:** history. Where wealth arose in a period or jurisdiction that produced no records, no amount of preparation manufactures evidence; the correct response is deferral or decline, not a better narrative (§15.14).

## 14.8 Family-member ineligibility

Family definitions differ between the two components and neither matches the other. The residence side is statutory and reasonably clear: the spouse or cohabitation-agreement partner, unmarried children under 21, direct ascendants of the spouses or partners, and adult children lacking legal capacity regardless of age; family permits expire simultaneously with the sponsor's, and a child reaching 21 receives an independent three-year permit.[^14-14] The age-out is a change of status with its own fee rather than a loss of status, and it is foreseeable: a child of 19 at application will age out during the first permit term.

The citizenship side carries the exposure. The decree grants inclusion only to the spouse and children as defined by Articles 10(4)–(5) of the Nationality Law — minor children at the naturalisation act, requestable up to one year after majority — with the spouse qualifying through a marriage of more than five years under the regime of community of acquired property (*comunhão de bens adquiridos*), cumulatively, or a court-recognised de facto union of more than three years.[^14-25][^14-23] Verification against both gazetted texts produced a negative finding: neither instrument provides for dependent children up to 30, or for parents or grandparents aged 55 and over, although the programme's published material presents those categories.[^14-31][^14-32] The only statutory hook for broader administrative categories is the ministers' power to approve the unit's internal procedures, and no such instrument has been located in the gazette. By the same memorandum of 10 April 2026, passport issuance for adult dependent children aged 18 and over is reported to have been placed on hold pending a revised dependency framework, with no evidence located that the hold has been lifted as at 2 August 2026.[^14-24] Extended dependants must therefore not be priced as a statutory entitlement, and their inclusion requires confirmation at the date of application.

Two further conditions apply per person rather than per file. A declaration of support is required for each dependant other than the spouse.[^14-25] The three-nationality cap is a condition of the Nationality Law expressed of the individual to be naturalised;[^14-23] how it is applied to dependants within a family application is addressed neither in that Law nor in the reported memorandum, and requires confirmation at the date of application. See Chapter 16.

**Who bears it.** The family. **What cannot be mitigated:** the marriage-duration condition is a fact about the past, and the age of a child at the date of a government decision is within nobody's control.

## 14.9 Banking rejection

A bank-account application is not a bank-account approval, and no part of this structure changes that. See §9.5.

The standard-setters are explicit about how a citizenship-by-investment document should be treated. Financial institutions are advised to establish that all nationalities and passports are disclosed at onboarding and, where such a document is offered as proof of identity, to ask for the original birth certificate and the passports held in the original identity, to verify place of birth and all current citizenship holdings, and to tag the accounts and mark such passports as investment-acquired. The same literature records that reputational risks associated with these programmes can affect correspondent banking relationships, citing an IMF Article IV assessment of Vanuatu; no São Tomé-specific banking consequence is evidenced.[^14-33]

The consequence runs in two directions. The additional passport cannot conceal the client's origin from a financial institution and must never be presented as though it could; the published record supports no prediction of outcome in either direction, and onboarding remains the bank's decision. And it confers no reporting advantage: São Tomé and Príncipe has not committed to the automatic exchange of financial account information, but reporting obligations are keyed to tax residence rather than citizenship, and a Greek account will be reported by the Greek bank to the client's residence jurisdictions.[^14-34]

**Who bears it.** The client. **Mitigation:** disclosure of all nationalities from the outset, and a documented source-of-wealth file the bank can test. A client holding the Greek permit is legally resident in a member state and may engage the right of access to a basic payment account subject to its conditions; a non-EU-resident third-country national holds no such right.[^14-35] **What cannot be mitigated:** onboarding is a commercial decision of the bank alone.

## 14.10 Failure to establish tax residence

This risk arises only for the client who wants a tax outcome, and it is the mirror image of the permit's principal convenience. Greek tax residence arises from presence exceeding 183 days cumulatively in any 12-month period — from the first day of presence — or from permanent or main residence, habitual abode or centre of vital interests, subject to treaty tie-breakers.[^14-36] The permit imposes no physical-presence condition at all: periods of absence are statutorily no obstacle to renewal.[^14-14] The feature that makes the permit easy to hold makes tax residence hard to acquire, because tax residence is acquired by living somewhere. The same asymmetry appears in the naturalisation register, where permit years count but the substantive conditions presuppose actual life in Greece; see §7.13. The citizenship component contributes nothing here: personal income tax in São Tomé and Príncipe is reported to be residence-based, with residence turning on presence of more than 180 days in the calendar year according to the only located secondary source and requiring primary confirmation at the date of application, and there is no citizenship-based taxation and no tax status conferred by the passport.[^14-37]

**Who bears it.** The client, and any adviser who has assumed a tax result. **What cannot be mitigated:** the client's home jurisdiction decides, on its own rules, whether he has ceased to be resident there. Departure is proved by facts, not documents (§9.6, §9.7, §9.12).

## 14.11 Unexpected tax liabilities

Three exposures recur, none obvious at the point of purchase.

**The deemed-income trap.** Greek objective living expenses never apply to a foreign tax resident, but the separate presumption on asset acquisition — which expressly includes the purchase of real estate — is disapplied only for a non-resident who acquires no income in Greece.[^14-30] The moment the property is let, the acquisition presumption applies in the purchase year. It is covered by documented imported foreign funds, so the exposure is evidential rather than substantive, but the evidence must have been created at the time of transfer rather than reconstructed afterwards. A client who genuinely relocates loses the exemption from living-expense presumptions altogether and falls into the current scale of €28, €45, €77, €140 and €280 per square metre, with zone uplifts of 30% and 58% and minimum deemed amounts of €3,000 and €5,000.[^14-30]

**Place of effective management.** A legal person is Greek tax resident if its place of effective management is in Greece at any time in the tax year, determined on facts and circumstances including day-to-day management, strategic decision-making, the annual general meeting, books, board meetings and directors' residence, with majority shareholders' residence a supplementary factor.[^14-38] A foreign holding company run in fact from a Greek base may acquire Greek corporate tax residence without any deliberate act. See §9.11.

**Ordinary compliance.** The E9 property declaration is due by 31 January of the year following the deed and is the classic first compliance failure of foreign owners.[^14-30] Separately, nothing is enacted beyond 31 December 2026 for the suspension of capital gains tax on real-estate transfers; were it to lapse, the rules as they stand contain no rebasing, so the whole documented gain since acquisition would become taxable.[^14-39] Chapter 12 models both continuation and lapse.

**Who bears it.** The client. **What cannot be mitigated:** a tax authority may characterise facts differently, and later, than the client's adviser did.

## 14.12 Property vacancy or underperformance

The property must be let to produce anything, and the permit restricts how it may be let. Long-term letting is expressly permitted; short-term letting and sub-letting are prohibited for properties acquired for the initial grant or renewal of an investor permit, breach carrying revocation of the permit and a standalone €50,000 administrative fine.[^14-14][^14-40] Primary-residence leases are reported across professional sources to carry a mandatory minimum duration of three years; the gazette text has not been read for this report and the rule requires confirmation at the date of application.[^14-41] The owner therefore cannot optimise the asset as an unencumbered owner could, and cannot recover vacant possession at short notice.

On the income side, the aggregator series put the Greek average gross residential yield at 4.38% and the Athens average at 5.52%, with the cheaper central-northern conversion districts showing the highest gross figures; those series are built from asking prices and asking rents, and transacted yields are lower.[^14-42] A realistic planning band for a €250,000-floor central-Athens conversion unit let long-term is 4.0% to 5.0% gross before costs, taxes and voids, floor-set pricing yielding less per euro than comparably priced conventional stock; that band is analysis, not a published figure. Estate agents report that earlier investor-permit owners let units 10% to 15% below comparable market rents, and any guaranteed-rent promise embedded in a sale price capitalises the permit rather than the flat.[^14-22] Housing rents fell 25.8% nominal from the 2011 peak to the 2018 trough, stayed there three further years, and by 2025 were still 8.8% below the 2011 peak nominally and 23.9% below in real terms.[^14-43] See §8.9 and §8.10.

**Who bears it.** The owner. **What cannot be mitigated:** the letting restrictions are conditions of the permit, so the asset's two functions are in direct tension — the immigration condition constrains the investment.

## 14.13 Currency risk

The structure runs on three currencies: the contribution and due-diligence fee in US dollars, the property and all Greek costs in euro, and the client's income, liabilities and consumption in a home currency that is usually neither. The report's working assumption is €1 = US$1.15 and §10.2 governs. That figure is a planning assumption, not a market rate and not a forecast (§10.2): the European Central Bank's euro foreign exchange reference rate stood at US$1.1535 on 3 August 2026, and 1.15 sits below that reference point and below the mean of the preceding twelve months of the same daily series.[^14-56]

| Item | US$ | € at US$1.10 | € at US$1.15 | € at US$1.20 |
|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|
| Contribution, single applicant | 90,000 | 81,818 | 78,261 | 75,000 |
| Due diligence and processing | 5,000 | 4,545 | 4,348 | 4,167 |
| US dollar items priced in Anexo I, single applicant | 95,000 | 86,363 | 82,609 | 79,167 |

*Table 14.3 — Sensitivity to the euro/dollar rate of the two US dollar amounts fixed in Anexo I for a single applicant. Each line is converted independently and rounded to the nearest euro, and the last row is the sum of the rounded lines, so it may differ by €1 from converting US$95,000 directly: at US$1.10 the summed lines give €86,363 against €86,364 converted directly, while at US$1.15 and at US$1.20 the two methods agree. The US$1.15 column applies the report's working planning assumption (§10.2). The rates shown are illustrative bracketing values, not forecasts; US$1.10 is below the lowest daily reference rate of the twelve months to 3 August 2026 and is used as an adverse stress rather than as an observed level. Outside the table: the official programme site's aggregate charge of US$750 per applicant for citizenship documents, which is reported rather than gazetted and requires confirmation at the date of application; and the Anexo I post-approval and additional-dependant amounts, which are per person. The US$95,000 in the last row is a sum of two single-applicant items and is not the US$95,000 family contribution for an application of two to four members (§10.3). Sources: Decree-Law 07/2025, Anexo I; official programme site; report FX convention, §10.2; European Central Bank daily reference series.*[^14-13][^14-44][^14-56]

At €1 = US$1.10 those two items cost €3,754 more than at the report's assumption, computed on the summed-line basis used in the table. The executive summary's illustrative planning figure leaves approximately €40,375 for all costs beyond the identified base, so a five-cent adverse move consumes roughly 9% of that allowance before a single professional fee is paid. The euro leg carries the same exposure in the opposite direction for a client whose home currency is weak against the euro, and applies to a much larger number.

**Who bears it.** The client. **Mitigation:** the required currency may be converted and held once the timing of the payment is known, and the contingency sized for the movement rather than the point estimate. **What cannot be mitigated:** the contribution is payable only after approval and within 90 days of it, so the payment date is unknown when the position is taken, and no ordinary hedge is available for an obligation contingent on a government decision.

## 14.14 Resale and liquidity risk

The retained property is the largest single item in the structure and the least liquid. Two constraints operate at once.

The first is the market. Greek apartment prices fell 42.4% nominal from the national peak in the third quarter of 2008 to the trough in the third quarter of 2017, Athens falling 44.7% from its peak in the second quarter of 2008 to its trough in the first quarter of 2017, across nine consecutive negative years from 2009 to 2017.[^14-45][^14-46] Deflated by consumer prices the national fall was approximately 46%, and as of 2025 the index remained approximately 18% below its 2008 level in real terms notwithstanding nominal recovery.[^14-45][^14-43] No official liquidity statistics are published: marketing-sector estimates, which are reported rather than official, suggest weeks to months for well-priced central stock in current conditions, while the 2008–2017 episode demonstrates conditions in which residential property became effectively illiquid for years.[^14-45]

The second is the buyer pool, and what follows is this report's analysis rather than a published figure. While the €250,000 category remains open, the natural buyer of a second-hand conversion at or above €250,000 is another investor-permit applicant, and whether a resold conversion re-qualifies a new application is an open administrative question unresolved in any published source. If the category closes or thresholds rise, residual value reverts to local fundamentals at district prices per square metre materially below floor-set pricing.[^14-14][^14-47][^14-42] Any resale also competes with a reported pipeline of 1,000 to 2,000 completed Athens conversion apartments marketed from spring 2026 and an estimated 3,000 to 5,000 more by 2027, clustered in the same few districts.[^14-47] Net foreign inflows into Greek property, the marginal source of demand for this stock, fell approximately 25.3% in 2025 after rising 28.9% in 2024.[^14-48]

Overlaying both is the permit: resale of the qualifying property during the permit's validity revokes the seller's permit.[^14-14] Selling to cut a loss costs the residence position. See §8.14 and §12.10.

**Who bears it.** The owner. **What cannot be mitigated:** the exit is constrained twice over, by the market and by the permit, and conventional property analysis does not capture the second constraint.

## 14.15 Revocation and post-approval risk

Approval is not the end of legal exposure on either side.

**Citizenship.** The Public Prosecutor may institute judicial opposition before the administrative court within six months counted from the declaration of acquisition of nationality, and that opposition has no suspensive effect.[^14-25][^14-23] A naturalised citizen may separately lose nationality for acts against state security, repeated acts against public health, or acquisition by fraud, decreed after a final court conviction and with no possibility of reacquisition, and loses it immediately on acquiring a fourth nationality.[^14-23] The decree's administrative sanctions include revocation of nationality, with a prior hearing always guaranteed, and it contains no express refund clause for any of these scenarios.[^14-25]

**Residence.** Sale of the qualifying property during the permit's validity revokes the seller's permit.[^14-14] Breach of the short-term letting prohibition carries revocation and a €50,000 fine.[^14-40] Change-of-use properties may not be used as the seat or branch of a business, though the exact mapping of fines to that breach requires confirmation against the gazette text.[^14-14] Circular 1/2026 states that permits may be revoked where arrangements reduce the effective investment below the statutory minimum.[^14-18] Family permits expire simultaneously with the sponsor's.[^14-14] A permit may also simply lapse: renewal is applied for within the two months before expiry, late filing is possible for up to three months after expiry at €100 for each month of delay, and beyond that renewal is barred absent proven force majeure — a rule taken from the current consolidated text, whose amending instrument is not yet pinned and requires confirmation at the date of application.[^14-49]

**Who bears it.** The client and, for the family permits, the family. **Mitigation:** three of the revocation grounds — resale, prohibited letting and company-seat use — are conduct-based and can be monitored, as can the renewal calendar (§17.17). **What cannot be mitigated:** the expiry of family permits with the sponsor's, and revocation on a re-characterisation of the investment, do not turn on the holder's conduct; on the citizenship side the six-month opposition window runs whatever the applicant does, and the standing of a young programme is affected by files other than the client's.

## 14.16 Adviser and intermediary risk

This section is stated from the published risk literature and applies to the market as a whole, not to any named participant.

The FATF and OECD identify weak intermediary oversight as a core vulnerability of citizenship- and residence-by-investment programmes, recording that many marketing agents work with little oversight or accountability and that criminal, negligent or complicit agents, wealth managers and concierge firms can assist in the abuse of these programmes. The same bodies record, in the same report, that these programmes attract an array of clients, many of whom have gained their assets legitimately and have benign intentions. Both statements are part of the record and neither should be reported without the other. Their principal structural recommendations are that each vetting layer screen applicants independently rather than rely on screening undertaken by another, and that agents be licensed or registered and regulated by the programme's supervising entity, with power to remove them permanently.[^14-33]

The citizenship component does operate a licensing regime: applications are initiated through licensed marketing agents, Anexo I sets an annual agent licence fee of US$5,000, and unlicensed promotion is punishable by a fine of up to US$500,000, though the provision's scope and territorial reach are undefined.[^14-25] At standard-setting level, FATF Recommendation 22 applies customer due diligence and record-keeping to designated non-financial businesses and professions including real-estate agents, lawyers, notaries, accountants and trust and company service providers.[^14-50] Within the European Union the anti-money-laundering regulation lists investment migration operators among obliged entities, but its architecture is establishment-based and it contains no extraterritorial-application clause; whether that listing reaches an adviser without an EU establishment is not settled, and this report describes the perimeter and stops there.[^14-51]

The practical exposures for a private client follow from that record rather than from any allegation: reliance on a single layer of screening whose adequacy the client cannot audit; unverified promotional claims, of which passport-ranking counts and stated processing times are the most common; and a chain of participants in which responsibility for the whole is allocated to nobody.

**Who bears it.** The client. **Mitigation:** independent regulated professionals retained by the client in each jurisdiction, engaged in writing, with responsibilities allocated expressly (Chapter 18); a documentary trail sufficient for a third party to reconstruct every step; and no reliance on any single participant's assurance that a matter has been checked. **What cannot be mitigated:** a client cannot audit the internal screening of a foreign administrative channel, and no adviser can substitute for a government's decision (§18.9).

## 14.17 Sequencing risk between jurisdictions

The two components are legally unconnected. They are administered by two states, on two timetables, with different points at which conditions crystallise, and nothing coordinates them but the client's own planning.

**Where the money commits first.** On the residence side the property must be acquired and paid in full, and the change of use completed, before the application is filed, so more than €250,000 is irrevocably committed before any residence decision exists.[^14-14] On the citizenship side the order is reversed: the processing fee is non-refundable after submission, but the contribution is payable only after approval, within 90 days.[^14-25] The components fail in opposite ways, and a client who assumes a common pattern will misjudge both. Published citizenship figures fix on admission; Greek thresholds on enactment of the amending statute subject to its transitional window; for Greek fees no crystallisation rule has been located (Table 14.2). A file sitting between two of those points is exposed to changes in the other. Where the residence application is filed by proxy before entry, the applicant and each family member must enter Greece within an exclusive 12-month period to give biometrics and produce the insurance document, and two failures to appear cause rejection.[^14-26] That window does not pause for a citizenship application or a passport reissue.

**The passport and permit pairing problem.** The Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement requires the residence permit plus a valid travel document, and no EU provision requires that travel document to be the passport against which the permit was issued.[^14-52] But the uniform residence-permit card prescribes nationality as a mandatory printed entry and prescribes no passport-number field, so the permit is in practice a nationality-bearing document recording the nationality of the passport against which the application was made.[^14-53] Official Belgian guidance requires the traveller to carry both documents and requires a 100% match of five identity parameters — name, first name, sex, date of birth and nationality — between them, stating that travel is not possible with a combination that does not match.[^14-54] Belgium is the only published national standard located and should be treated as the strictest documented benchmark rather than the Schengen norm, since no Schengen-wide matching rule exists in the Borders Code, the Convention or the Commission's practical handbook.[^14-54]

A Greek permit issued against the client's original passport, paired with a newly issued São Tomé passport, may therefore fail identity matching at a border applying that standard, and the new passport should not be assumed to travel with the existing permit. Greek law obliges the holder to declare, through the migration information system, every change of personal status and in particular a change of nationality, and any loss, renewal or change of passport details, within two months, with a €100 fine and €200 on repetition; card details may be changed only on the strength of the foreign authority's own documents, and reissue carries a €100 fee.[^14-55] Whether Greece re-keys the permit to a newly acquired second nationality while the original subsists is not published in the statute, the ministerial decision or the administrative record, and requires confirmation from Greek counsel at the date of application. Where the original nationality is lost on acquiring São Toméan citizenship, the declaration route becomes obligatory. None of this alters where the mobility comes from: short-stay movement in other Schengen states arises from the Greek residence permit throughout, and the second passport remains subject to the ordinary Schengen visa requirement.

**Who bears it.** The client. **Mitigation:** a single sequencing plan fixing the order of the two applications, the compulsory-visit window and the passport position before either file is opened (§17.1, §5.9); pending Greek counsel's advice on declaration and reissue, the matching original passport remains the travel document. **What cannot be mitigated:** two sovereign administrations running two independent timetables. Neither is obliged to accommodate the other, and neither will.

### Notes

[^14-1]: Greece, Law 5007/2022 (Government Gazette A′ 241/23.12.2022), Articles 91 (threshold) and 92 (transitional provision); deposit-deadline extension per the coordinating notarial circular; via Hellenic Bank Association note, https://www.hba.gr/News/Details/2285 and https://lawnet.gr/law-news/egk-syntonistikis-symv-fon-paratasi-pliromis-prokatavolis-a92-n-5007-2022-golden-visa-eos-31-7-2023/ (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-2]: Greece, Law 5100/2024, Article 64 (Government Gazette A′ 49/05.04.2024), as codified with Law 5167/2024 (A′ 207/20.12.2024, including Article 37 §1 transition); official consolidated text in Greek at https://migration.gov.gr/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Νόμος-5100_2024-κωδικοποιημένος-με-τον-5167_2024-ΦΕΚ-Α-49_5.4.2024.pdf (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-3]: Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber), judgment of 29 April 2025, Case C-181/23 *Commission v Malta*, EU:C:2025:283, paragraphs 96–102 and operative part; https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62023CJ0181 (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-4]: European Commission, Recommendation C(2022) 2028 final, 28 March 2022, points 1–2; https://investmentmigration.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/recommendation-limit-access-individuals-connected-Russian-Belarusian-government-citizenship-residence-EU-through-investor-schemes_en.pdf (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-5]: European Commission, Investor Citizenship Schemes policy page, checked for post-judgment initiatives as at 2 August 2026 (dated statement of absence); https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/democracy-eu-citizenship-anti-corruption/eu-citizenship/investor-citizenship-schemes_en (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-6]: Professional and press reporting on the closure of Spain's programme (3 April 2025) and Portugal's 2023 removal of real estate, via globalcitizensolutions.com and spainexpat.com; reported tier, search-verified (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-7]: São Tomé and Príncipe, Decreto-Lei n.º 07/2025 (*Regulamentação da Nacionalidade por Investimento ou Doação*), Diário da República I Série N.º 33, 1 August 2025, pp. 429–440 (gazette facsimile, read in Portuguese), https://ntltrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/STP-CBI-Act-01082025-1-1.pdf; parliamentary-passage point per Lusa, "São Tomé permite obtenção de nacionalidade com investimento ou doação a partir de 90 mil dólares", 15 August 2025 (reported tier), https://www.rtp.pt/noticias/mundo/sao-tome-permite-obtencao-de-nacionalidade-com-investimento-ou-doacao-a-partir-de-90-mil-dolares_n1676574 (both accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-8]: Associated Press via US News, Ecofin Agency and IFES ElectionGuide, São Tomé and Príncipe presidential election of 19 July 2026 (Vila Nova re-elected in the first round with 55.94%, preliminary results) and parliamentary elections scheduled for 27 September 2026; via usnews.com, ecofinagency.com and electionguide.org (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-9]: Regulation (EU) 2025/2441 of 26 November 2025 (revision of the visa-suspension mechanism), inserting Article 8a(1)(e) into Regulation (EU) 2018/1806, OJ L, 10 December 2025; https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32025R2441 (accessed 2 August 2026). The Regulation entered into force on 30 December 2025 under its Article 2. 
[^14-10]: Regulation (EU) 2018/1806, Annex I, consolidated version of 30 December 2025; https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02018R1806-20251230 (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-11]: Council Decision (EU) 2022/366 of 3 March 2022 (OJ L 69, 4.3.2022, p. 105), partial suspension from 4 May 2022; Council Decision (EU) 2022/2198 of 8 November 2022 (OJ L 292, 11.11.2022, p. 47), full suspension from 4 February 2023; Regulation (EU) 2025/11 of 19 December 2024 (OJ L, 14.1.2025), transfer of Vanuatu to Annex I; all at eur-lex.europa.eu (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-12]: European Commission, COM(2025) 792 final, Eighth Report under the Visa Suspension Mechanism, 19 December 2025, Annex I; https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0792 (accessed 2 August 2026). The report contains no phase-out deadline; the reported demand for discontinuation by 1 June 2028 sits in unpublished Commission correspondence of 25 June 2026 and is reported tier only, per IMI Daily, 7 July 2026, https://www.imidaily.com/caribbean/end-cbi-by-june-2028-or-risk-schengen-access-eu-writes-to-caribbean-states-antigua-says/ (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-13]: Decreto-Lei n.º 07/2025, Article 22(1)–(2) and Anexo I §§1–4 (fees, minimum contributions, joint-order amendment power); source as note 7. 
[^14-14]: Greece, Law 5038/2023 (Immigration Code, Government Gazette A′ 81/01.04.2023), Articles 95 §2, 100 §§2–11 and 171, consolidated text (codification runs through Law 5307/2026), read via taxheaven.gr article views; https://www.taxheaven.gr/law/5038/2023 (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-15]: Türkiye, *Türk Vatandaşlığı Kanununun Uygulanmasına İlişkin Yönetmelik* (2010/139), consolidated official text, Article 20(2) and effective-date table, https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/21.5.2010139.pdf; Karar 5554, Resmî Gazete No. 31834 of 13 May 2022, https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2022/05/20220513.htm (both accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-16]: Greece, Joint Ministerial Decision 214926/2025 (Government Gazette B′ 6014/11.11.2025), Articles 1–3 and §2.6 (change-of-use documentation; the €2,000 electronic fee as a filing document; the engineer's report and its planning-act formula); FEK PDF at https://www.pomida.gr/assets/File/1236_20250206014.pdf, with concordant reproductions at https://www.taxheaven.gr/circulars/51471/214926-10-11-2025 and https://www.retv.gr/2025/11/21492626-golden-visa.html (accessed 2 August 2026). The decision fixes the documents required, not the moment at which a published fee crystallises for a file. 
[^14-17]: Greece, National Registry of Administrative Public Services (mitos.gov.gr), "Permanent golden visa (change of use) – Initial issuance", last updated 31 July 2026; https://en.mitos.gov.gr/index.php/ΔΔ:Permanent_golden_visa_(change_of_use)_–_Initial_issuance (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-18]: Greece, Circular 1/2026 of the Secretary General for Migration Policy, 21 April 2026; content via Sioufas & Associates, https://www.sioufaslaw.gr/golden-visa-διευκρινίσεις-εφαρμογής-του-άρθρ-100/, and IMI Daily, https://www.imidaily.com/europe/greece-cracks-down-on-golden-visa-fraud-in-sprawling-new-circular/ (accessed 2 August 2026). Circular text itself not opened; content is reported tier, as is the once-only effect corroborated in professional commentary. 
[^14-19]: Greece, Law 4495/2017 (Government Gazette A′ 167/03.11.2017), Article 83 (owner's responsible declaration and engineer's certificate on every inter vivos transfer), consolidated text; https://www.taxheaven.gr/law/4495/2017/article/83/view (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-20]: Electronic Building Identity (Ηλεκτρονική Ταυτότητα Κτιρίου): dossier contents and Completeness Certificate per proper.gr, *Ηλεκτρονική Ταυτότητα Κτιρίου — οδηγός*, https://proper.gr/ilektroniki-taftotita-ktiriou-odigos/ (accessed 2 August 2026). Reported tier; the commonly stated mandatory-from date of 1 April 2022 does not appear on that page and the activating decision has not been pinned — the date and the current scope require confirmation at the date of application. 
[^14-21]: Hellenic Cadastre, announcement of 27 May 2026 on national coverage and operational status, via GTP Headlines, https://news.gtp.gr/2026/05/27/greek-land-registry-reaches-99-national-coverage/; person-based legacy registries versus parcel-based cadastre and the certificate set per Global Law Experts, *How to check property title, Greece*, https://globallawexperts.com/how-to-check-property-title-greece/ (both accessed 2 August 2026). Reported tier. 
[^14-22]: capital.gr, «Η επόμενη ημέρα της αγοράς ακινήτων», 27 October 2024 (Bank of Greece official Vlachostergiou on the age and vacancy of the Athens stock; Binaris on investor-permit units let 10–15% below comparable market rents); https://www.capital.gr/oikonomia/3881323/i-epomeni-imera-tis-agoras-akiniton/ (accessed 2 August 2026). Reported tier. 
[^14-23]: São Tomé and Príncipe, Lei n.º 7/2022 (*Lei da Nacionalidade*), Diário da República I Série N.º 25, 10 March 2022, Articles 6, 10, 11, 12, 16 and 19–20; https://citizenshiprightsafrica.org/wp-content/uploads/STP-Lei.07.2022.pdf (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-24]: Citizenship unit director's memorandum of 10 April 2026 (hold on applications from holders of three or more foreign nationalities; hold on passport issuance to adult dependants aged 18 and over), as reported by IMI Daily, "São Tomé Introduces Remote Passport Issuance, Clarifies Three-Nationality Rule", 11 April 2026; https://www.imidaily.com/africa/sao-tome-introduces-remote-passport-issuance-clarifies-three-nationality-rule/ (accessed 2 August 2026). Reported tier; the underlying three-nationality cap is statutory (note 23). 
[^14-25]: Decreto-Lei n.º 07/2025, Articles 4, 6(3), 9–11, 14, 17, 18 and Anexo I §§2–3; source as note 7. 
[^14-26]: Greece, Law 5038/2023, Articles 8(ε), 10 §11, 14 §7 and 17 §1 (proxy filing; 12-month exclusive entry period; biometrics; rejection on two failures to appear), gazette text at https://www.elinyae.gr/sites/default/files/2024-09/81α_2023.pdf, cross-checked against the consolidated text (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-27]: Greece, Ministry of Migration and Asylum, monthly bulletin "Νόμιμη Μετανάστευση — Μάρτιος 2026, ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ Β", golden-visa tables 12α–17; https://migration.gov.gr/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ-Β_Μάρτιος_2026_ΥΜΑ-GR-Ενημερωτικό-Μάρτιος-Β-Νόμιμη-Μετανάστευση.pdf (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-28]: Greece, Law 5038/2023, Article 8(ε) (full sickness insurance), gazette text as note 26; the operative document at issuance and renewal per JMD 214926/2025 as note 16; coverage minimums per KYA οικ. 53821/2014 of 21 October 2014, https://migration.gov.gr/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/ΚΥΑ53821_2014.pdf, whose formal survival under the current Code is unresolved — the amounts are stated as fixed under the predecessor Code and still applied in practice, subject to confirmation at the date of application; indicative premium bands and the 65+ loading / 75+ availability point per insurancemarket.gr, mygoldenvisa.io and soeasyinsurance.gr (reported tier — written quotes required), https://www.insurancemarket.gr/asfalisi-allodapon-adeia-diamonis (all accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-29]: FATF/OECD, *Misuse of Citizenship and Residency by Investment Programmes*, FATF, Paris, November 2023, Executive Summary ¶7 and ¶¶139, 148; https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/reports/Misuse-CBI-RBI-Programmes.pdf (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-30]: Greece, Law 4172/2013, Articles 30–34 (presumptive income), 41 (real-estate capital gains) and 67 (filing), consolidated texts via taxheaven.gr, https://www.taxheaven.gr/law/4172/2013/article/41/view (and /30, /31, /32, /33, /34, /67); non-resident carve-out corroborated by AADE, *FAQs for Greeks abroad and Non-residents* (November 2025 edition), FAQs 16–17 and 28, https://www.aade.gr/sites/default/files/2025-11/FAQs_omogeneis_en_0.pdf; E9 declaration deadline per Article 23 of Law 3427/2005 (all accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-31]: Negative finding verified against both gazetted texts: neither Decreto-Lei 07/2025 nor Lei 7/2022 provides for dependent children up to 30 or for parents or grandparents aged 55 and over; sources as notes 7 and 23. 
[^14-32]: Citizenship unit, cip.gov.st "Become a Citizen" page, Wayback capture of 17 July 2026; https://web.archive.org/web/20260717032201/https://cip.gov.st/become-a-citizen (accessed 2 August 2026). Official-site content, reported tier. 
[^14-33]: FATF/OECD, *Misuse of Citizenship and Residency by Investment Programmes*, November 2023, Executive Summary ¶¶1, 5 and ¶¶42, 112, 126, 131, 139, 164, 170, 172; source as note 29. 
[^14-34]: OECD Global Forum, "Status of commitments for the automatic exchange of financial account information (AEOI)", last updated 27 July 2026, https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/networks/global-forum-tax-transparency/aeoi-commitments.pdf (São Tomé and Príncipe absent from every cohort); the tax-residence keying of reporting and the reporting of a Greek account to the client's residence jurisdictions per OECD, "Residence/Citizenship by investment schemes", https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/international-standards-on-tax-transparency/residence-citizenship-by-investment.html, and the FATF/OECD report at note 29 (all accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-35]: Directive 2014/92/EU on payment accounts, Article 16(2) (right of access to a payment account with basic features for consumers legally resident in the Union); https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32014L0092 (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-36]: Greece, Law 4172/2013, Article 4 (183 days cumulatively in any 12-month period; permanent or main residence; habitual abode; centre of vital interests; treaty tie-breakers), consolidated text via taxheaven.gr, https://www.taxheaven.gr/law/4172/2013/article/4/view; corroborated by ICLG, *Private Client Laws and Regulations 2026 — Greece* (Zepos & Yannopoulos), 14 January 2026, https://iclg.com/practice-areas/private-client-laws-and-regulations/greece/ (both accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-37]: Immigrant Invest, "Taxes in São Tomé and Príncipe" (personal income tax reported as residence-based; residence at more than 180 days in the calendar year); https://immigrantinvest.com/blog/sao-tome-and-principe-taxes/ (accessed 2 August 2026). Industry secondary source and the only one located; the São Toméan income-tax code itself was not located, and both the threshold and the residence basis require primary confirmation at the date of application. 
[^14-38]: Greece, Law 4172/2013, Article 4(3)(c) and 4(4) (place of effective management), consolidated text via taxheaven.gr; https://www.taxheaven.gr/law/4172/2013/article/4/view (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-39]: Greece, Article 90 of Law 5162/2024 (Government Gazette A′ 198/05.12.2024), suspending Article 41 of Law 4172/2013 to 31 December 2026, consolidated text at https://www.taxheaven.gr/law/5162/2024/article/90/view and corroborated on the government housing portal at https://stegasi.gov.gr/programs/anastoli-epivolis-forou-yperaxias-apo-metavivasi-akiniton/; nothing enacted beyond that date as at 2 August 2026, press reporting of possible extension being reported tier per capital.gr, 8 July 2026, https://www.capital.gr/tax/4003408/akinita-pros-paratasi-kai-to-2027-i-anastoli-tou-fpa-sta-neodmita-kai-to-pagoma-tou-forou-uperaxias/ (all accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-40]: Greece, Law 5038/2023, Article 100 §7A, as inserted by Article 64 of Law 5100/2024 (prohibition of short-term letting and sub-letting; revocation and €50,000 fine), sources as notes 2 and 14; corroborated by Notarial Coordinating Circular 13/11.04.2024, https://enotariat.gr/?p=14285 (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-41]: Iason Skouzos TaxLaw, "The duration and termination of a lease contract" (three-year minimum duration of primary-residence leases under Article 2 of Law 1703/1987 as amended by Article 1(5) of Law 2235/1994), uniformly stated across professional sources; https://www.taxlaw.gr/en/practice-areas/real-estate/the-duration-and-termination-of-a-lease-contract/ (accessed 2 August 2026). Gazette text not read — the rule requires confirmation at the date of application. 
[^14-42]: Global Property Guide, Greece rental yields, data as at May 2026 (4.38% national, 2026 Q2; Athens 5.52%); asking-price and asking-rent methodology; via archive.org capture of https://www.globalpropertyguide.com/europe/greece/rental-yields (accessed 2 August 2026). Reported tier. 
[^14-43]: Eurostat, harmonised index of consumer prices for Greece (ELSTAT-compiled), annual average indices CP041 "actual rentals for housing" and CP00 "all items"; API data downloaded and all figures computed locally; https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/api/dissemination/statistics/1.0/data/prc_hicp_aind?format=JSON&lang=EN&geo=EL&coicop=CP041&unit=INX_A_AVG (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-44]: Citizenship unit, "Financial Layout" page on the official programme site, government domain cip.gov.st (aggregate charge of US$750 per applicant for citizenship documents); https://cip.gov.st/donation-to-the-national-transformation-fund (accessed 4 August 2026). Official-site content, reported tier; the gazetted Anexo I contains no passport, identity-card or certificate fee. 
[^14-45]: Bank of Greece national apartment price index as republished by the Bank for International Settlements, series QGRN628BIS; CSV downloaded and recomputed; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.csv?id=QGRN628BIS (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-46]: Bank of Greece, "New Index of Apartment Prices by Geographical Area" (Athens series, file version 25 November 2025), the Bank's own open-data file, via Internet Archive capture at http://web.archive.org/web/20260718123712/https://www.bankofgreece.gr/OpenDataSetFilesALL/DOAM/New_Index_of_Apartment_Prices_by_Geographical_Area_en_2025-11-25.xls; parsed and recomputed (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-47]: Proto Thema (economy), conversion-stock pipeline and investor-permit stock returning to market, 26 December 2025; https://www.protothema.gr/economy/article/1748790/ (accessed 2 August 2026). Reported tier. 
[^14-48]: European Mortgage Federation, *Hypostat 2025*, Greece chapter (Akantziliotou and Papapetrou, Bank of Greece), September 2025, https://hypo.org/sites/default/files/2025-09/Greece.pdf, for the Bank of Greece inflow series (approximately €2.75bn in 2024, +28.9%); the 2025 figure of approximately €2.06bn (−25.3%) per realting.com, "Greek housing market 2025 results", https://realting.com/news/greek-housing-market-2025-results (both accessed 2 August 2026). The 2025 figure is reported tier. 
[^14-49]: Greece, Law 5038/2023, Article 11 §1, CURRENT consolidated text (renewal within the two months before expiry; late filing up to three months after expiry at €100 for each month of delay; barred thereafter absent proven force majeure), read via taxheaven.gr as note 14 and cross-checked against the gazette text as note 26, which it supersedes. The amending instrument has not been identified in this report; the rule requires confirmation at the date of application. 
[^14-50]: FATF, *The FATF Recommendations: International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism and Proliferation* (2012, updated October 2025), Recommendation 22 and Glossary (designated non-financial businesses and professions); https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/recommendations/FATF%20Recommendations%202012.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-51]: Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 (anti-money-laundering regulation), Article 3(3)(l) (investment migration operators) and Articles 2(1)(18) and 8, OJ L, 19 June 2024, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=OJ:L_202401624; Directive (EU) 2024/1640, Article 37(1) (supervision of obliged entities established in the member state's territory), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=OJ:L_202401640 (both accessed 2 August 2026). The Regulation contains no extraterritorial-application clause. 
[^14-52]: Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement, Article 21, as replaced by Article 1(2) of Regulation (EU) No 265/2010; https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32010R0265 (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-53]: Regulation (EC) No 1030/2002 (uniform format for residence permits), consolidated version of 21 November 2017, and the Annex as replaced by Regulation (EU) 2017/1954 (mandatory card entry "8. Nationality"; no passport-number field); https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02002R1030-20171121 (accessed 2 August 2026). 
[^14-54]: Belgian Immigration Office, "Visa-free travel with residence permits — general principles" (both documents to be carried; 100% match of five identity parameters including nationality); https://dofi.ibz.be/en/themes/entry/border-control/visa-free-residence-permits/general-principles (accessed 2 August 2026). No Schengen-wide matching rule exists in the Schengen Borders Code (consolidated version of 12 October 2025), the Convention or the Commission's Practical Handbook for Border Guards (2022 edition) — verified absence; Belgium is the only published national standard located. 
[^14-55]: Greece, Law 5038/2023, Articles 19 §§1(β),(γ), 4 and 20 §1 (declaration of change of nationality and passport details; two-month period; €100 fine, €200 on repetition; card changes only on the foreign authority's documents; €100 reissue fee); gazette text as note 26. 
[^14-56]: European Central Bank, euro foreign exchange reference rates (EUR/USD), daily series, rate of 3 August 2026 = 1.1535; https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/policy_and_exchange_rates/euro_reference_exchange_rates/html/eurofxref-graph-usd.en.html (accessed 4 August 2026). The reference rates are published for information purposes only and are not transaction rates.
